Pezholio

07 Dec, 2009

Twitter – to RSS or not RSS?

Posted by: Pez In: Council Stuff| social-media

It’s been a while since I first published my Beginners’ Guide to Twitter in Local Government, and since then (although, obviously not as a direct result of my blog post!) there’s been a plethora of local authorities using Twitter.

However, with a few notable exceptions, most councils seem to prefer the ‘fire and forget’ method of sticking an RSS feed into Twitterfeed and leaving it to run. Hell, even I was guilty of it up until recently – even though I was making an effort to monitor and engage, I was still letting the news articles automatically publish via Twitterfeed.

There’s been a bit of a discussion recently via Twitter as to the rights and wrongs of this, and I’m definitely in the ‘wrong’ camp now – A few months ago I turned off the RSS feed for @lichfield_dc press releases and now do them manually. Why? Well, I shall tell you…

You don’t talk to a robot

Twitter is, by and large, a social medium – if all you’re doing is chucking out press releases, people will assume you’re not interested in engaging or are just going to generate boring content. This means you aren’t going to get followed by as many people who might otherwise be interested in you.

Auto tweets look ugly

Take this press release for example. If I were to use an auto tweeter, here’s what it would look like:

News: Everyone is invited to get into the festive spirit at this year’s Christmas Fayre taking place in the city… http://is.gd/5eZUT

Pretty boring huh? Plus the content gets cut short and can often not make sense. However, if I conjour up a manual tweet, I can tailor it much more to the Twitter medium and come up with something a lot more friendly:

This means you can get your message across much more easily and in a style that fits in with Twitter’s informal approach.

Stopping information overload

Sometimes you’ll have a press release which, while it might be relevant for the website, might not be suitbale for Twitter. If you’re blindly tweeting everything you put out, then people might be much more likely to be turned off by your content and reach for that big button marked ‘unfollow’.

This is all well and good, but…

…I can hear the objections already – ‘I don’t have time to write manual tweets’ – but how difficult it it to write a 140 character tweet? If you’re going to take online engagement seriously, it’s definitely worth just taking 2 minutes to show your followers you care.

If you really must use automated tweets, then make sure you mark your account up as such – call it something like ‘councilx_news’ and state very clearly that all you’re doing is publishing the latest news – then if further down the line you decide to engage a bit more, you can start another account for more human interaction.

I’m a massive hypocrite

However, after saying all this, I do agree that sometimes, automated tweets have their place. We do still tweet food safety inspections, and @ldcplanning has been happily tweeting planning applications for a while now. However, it’s not really practical to tweet large volume, samey tweets manually, and you don’t get the same advantages with tweeting press releases.

In fact, I recently did a straw poll amongst our followers about whether to get rid of the food safety tweets, especially as much of the content is replicated by @ratemyplace, but the majority seemed to like them. So maybe automated tweets isn’t as open and shut a case as I’d like it to be?

13 Responses to "Twitter – to RSS or not RSS?"

1 | Esko Reinikainen

December 7th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

Avatar

I think there is room for both. On @monmouthshireCC our comms team sends individually parcelled tweets about news items from the web and we have a RSS feed releasing items too. The same link coming out at two different times with a different flavour tweet reinforces the message.

Although I have to agree that only RSS driven twitter feeds is a big no no and potentially quite unproductive.

2 | docdelete

December 7th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

Avatar

I suppose, too, that a lot depends on (a) how familiar your followers are with you and your style, and (b) your ratio of manual:automatic tweets.

I see no harm in the odd auto tweet, if at the same time there’s an active continuum of ‘real’ tweets.

3 | Jon Bounds

December 7th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Avatar

“The same link coming out at two different times with a different flavour tweet reinforces the message.”

And no doubt annoys everyone.

For me the only place for auto tweets is on a separate feed, which is marked clearly as such.

4 | Greener Leith

December 7th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

Avatar

We tweet a mixture of auto-tweets and human ones. People don’t seem to mind! That’s the great thing about Twitter – it’s a very flexible tool. Providing your auto-tweets are on-topic for your audience it doesn’t seem to matter too much. However, honesty probably is the best policy in all things.

5 | Pez

December 8th, 2009 at 9:35 am

Avatar

Oh yeah, I am by no means saying that I AM THE ARBITER OF ALL THAT IS RIGHT AND TRUE, but I think we’re all in agreement that 100% auto tweets is A Bad Thing.

Having said that, if I’d have had my time again, I definitely wouldn’t have any auto tweets in the @lichfield_dc stream at all.

However, people do seem to like them and find them useful, so, although it might not sit comfortably with me personally, the majority of our audience don’t seem to mind.

6 | e

December 10th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

Avatar

“Plus the content gets cut short and can often not make sense.” That’s a flaw in Twitter, not in anything else. The 140-char limit does not permit effective communication of news — only throwaway contextless babble.

7 | Pez

December 10th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

Avatar

That’s a fault of the communicator, not the medium. If you can’t get across what you’re trying to say in 140 characters, then you’re not trying hard enough.

Besides, the tweet is only to communicate what the story’s about, not the whole content.

8 | e

December 10th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

Avatar

“If you can’t get across what you’re trying to say in 140 characters, then you’re not trying hard enough.” Blimey, what a remarkable statement. Have Twitter people never seen a novel? a newspaper article? a train timetable?

Point taken about only needing a summary, though.

9 | Adrian Short

December 10th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

Avatar

I’m not a big fan of automated tweets but like everything, they have their place. Content is best written to fit the medium rather than re-purposed. This is an issue with content syndication in general and one of the reasons why some people/orgs are resistant to RSS feeds. They don’t want people reading the content out of context and without the surrounding support material.

All that said, my own council’s automated headline retweeter @lbsuttonnews has got nearly 400 followers, which is quite respectable. Clearly they can tolerate recycled headlines, but with that level of readership a bit of time fitting the content to suit the medium would definitely be justified.

10 | Pez

December 10th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

Avatar

I honestly had no idea there was active resistance to RSS feeds! I thought the main issue was technology. Crazy.

@lbsuttonnews seem to do it right in terms of being open about the fact that it is a news feed, but just looking at the content makes me feel sleepy.

It’s about injecting a bit of ‘zing’ into your feed that makes people sit up and be aware of what the council is doing, rather than seeing a tweet in their stream and being instantly turned off.

11 | maidbloke

December 10th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

Avatar

Good article and it made me think about the pros and cons of automatic tweeting.

One point I think you missed is about tweet timing. Human-typed tweets will normally be sent at “sensible” times of the day when audiences will be higher. However bots don’t think about that sort of thing.

A good example of this is http://twitter.com/RBWM which sends its “NEWS:” tweets just after midnight, presumably just after the press release embargo has expired. Note that this account also has humans tweeting too, so it fits the “bit of both” type of account.

12 | iamadonut

December 14th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

Avatar

the tweet is, in some respects, the equivalent of the press release hook. in other words, the reader will decide whether or not to click the link based on the tweet.

but, our RSS feed lead with the headline, which is not quite the same as the hook.

i did think about getting the @ndevoncouncil team to write the headline with a view to making it a tweet/hook as well.

but, thinking this through (with props to @danslee/@walsallcouncil), tweets are part of a conversation. a headline or even a hook might not always be delivered in conversational form.

also, some of our news releases don’t really lend themselves to the medium. “No change to taxi driver licence policy” anyone?

conclusion: we’re going to go with hand tweeted news items for a trial period trying to make the message fit the medium. we’ll leave other automated tweets – consultations, jobs, weather and traffic – as is.

13 | Dan Slee

January 21st, 2010 at 4:53 pm

Avatar

No to auto tweets. No to RSS.

It’s meant to be social.

Unless it’s a special jobs or planning applications feed which can churn through dozens a week…

kthxbai

Comment Form

Twitter / @pezholio



Desperate monetisation attempt…