Pezholio

04 Nov, 2009

Impossible possibilities – A wishlist for linked data

Posted by: Pez In: Open Data

I’ve been playing around with the Ordnance Survey linked data and, while it’s not perfect, it’s certainly a step in the right direction.

It’s got me thinking though – in an ideal world, where an ‘information-wants-to-be-free’-esque hippy such as myself could get all the data I wanted, what cool stuff could be added on to this dataset to make it *really* useful?

  • Shape files for all administrative regions

    Yes, now this really is cloud cuckoo land, I know we can use the unit ID in combination with OpenSpace to display the layers, but, let’s be honest, OpenSpace isn’t great.

    As with the linked data, it’s a step in the right direction, but the mapping (until you get down to street view) is not designed for screen, and the API is still a bit too buggy. I know there’s also a few licensing issues that a couple of people aren’t too comfortable with. Besides, shouldn’t we be able to use the platform that we want to use?

  • Postcodes in every administrative region

    This is where things get really cool, imagine if in every resource, there was a list of every postcode contained in that area – for example, looking at the resource for the resource for Coleshill, we could have listed every single postcode in that parish.

    This would mean that, once others started making datasets that used the OS linked data URIs as identifiers, a simple postcode search would reveal everything that was relevant to that area.

    Even better, every postcode could have its own URI (for example http://data.royalmail.co.uk/postcode/WS13+6YY (now you know I’m dreaming!)) which gave information about where that postcode was (lat/long, parish, police authority, council etc etc).

This is just a taster to get some conversation going, but please feel free to add your own ideas in the comments. Forget about licensing, let’s just imagine a brave new world of free data without limits and just go mad on this thing.

8 Responses to "Impossible possibilities – A wishlist for linked data"

1 | Graham

November 4th, 2009 at 10:46 am

Avatar

Dear Father Christmas, I would like to be able to construct “personal space identifiers” – say, manually, through GPs, etc – that would map to geographic identifiers such as postcodes, e.g. “exmosis/home : WS13 6YY, exmosis/work : WS13 6YZ”, or other identifiers such as latitude and longitude.

It sounds a bit FOAFy, but could be useful as a) a way to look up locations-relating-to-people without getting the address from them, b) mapping personal data to wider data, with a context, e.g. aggregate all data tagged with a postcode, OR just people who have “work” tagged to a particular postcode. This might be useful if data is relevant to particular functions/times of day/what-have-you.

I’m still thinking this through, but I kind of like the idea for some reason. Also I have no idea how this relates to the above. Yet.

2 | Pez

November 4th, 2009 at 10:49 am

Avatar

Cool idea, but I can see the Daily Mail headlines already – “Government Spies giving YOUR data away” – really cool, and I think it’s got legs, but I can’t see the privacy-at-any-cost brigade being happy with it!

3 | Graham

November 4th, 2009 at 11:28 am

Avatar

Yeah, there’s still that big issue of data-management (see http://bit.ly/1FGLm0), but reckon merging/comparing personal local data to aggregate local data would be a big win… One for Google, probably ;)

4 | PaulG

November 4th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

Avatar

That it be mandated that suppliers to local government publish their data in the form of centrally controlled, and recognised data sets, or get £ penalized.

That councils make that data (less the personal stuff) available online or ditto, get their grant cut.

5 | Chris Brierley

November 5th, 2009 at 12:33 am

Avatar

I’m actually working on a project to gather UK postcode data, and release as an open source dataset. The plan is currently to gather street address data, to avoid legal issues the data is gathered by people submitting postcodes and street addresses that they know themselves (home, work etc).

The idea was to then have an API which can be queried to return the relevant address, which would allow web applications to get the data without needing to licence the PAF.

The database is being redesigned to add some new features, mainly the latitude/longitude of each postcode. You have given me some great ideas to include! I will be adding tags to allow people to specify things like police authorities and local authorities. Thanks for sharing the wishlist.

6 | Pez

November 5th, 2009 at 11:03 am

Avatar

No problem, happy to help! Might be worth referencing the postcodes you do have against the Free the Postcode database (http://www.freethepostcode.org/), so you’ve got a load of lat/lngs to add to your existing data.

7 | Chris Brierley

November 6th, 2009 at 9:56 pm

Avatar

Heh, that was the intended datasource for the lat/long :)

8 | Last week’s links « Policy and Performance

November 16th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

Avatar

[...] Pezholio » Blog Archive » Impossible possibilities – A wishlist for linked data Setting out some architecture possibilities which would make turning open data into linked data easier. [...]

Comment Form

Twitter / @pezholio



Desperate monetisation attempt…