<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal Mail calls striking workers &#8216;whiny&#8217; on Twitter. Sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Musings on local government, web development, music and tings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:21:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: isemann</title>
		<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>isemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pezholio.co.uk/?p=242#comment-311</guid>
		<description>As a former frontline RM worker I can confirm your suggestion above Pez.

R!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former frontline RM worker I can confirm your suggestion above Pez.</p>
<p>R!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pez</title>
		<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Pez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pezholio.co.uk/?p=242#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... Yeah, you&#039;re probably right, it&#039;s a bit of a stretch - in my defence, I hadn&#039;t been up long, and probably could&#039;ve phrased it better :)

My reply to Matthew still stands though - it&#039;s just not a very professional thing to do - especially as everyone can see your favourites and they appear on your Twitter page. I&#039;m sure they didn&#039;t realise that this would happen, but it does suggest that the Royal Mail has a less than respectful attitude to its frontline workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; Yeah, you&#8217;re probably right, it&#8217;s a bit of a stretch &#8211; in my defence, I hadn&#8217;t been up long, and probably could&#8217;ve phrased it better <img src='http://www.pezholio.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My reply to Matthew still stands though &#8211; it&#8217;s just not a very professional thing to do &#8211; especially as everyone can see your favourites and they appear on your Twitter page. I&#8217;m sure they didn&#8217;t realise that this would happen, but it does suggest that the Royal Mail has a less than respectful attitude to its frontline workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pezholio.co.uk/?p=242#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Totally agree that organisations need to be careful using Twitter. But think it&#039;s a real stretch to say that favouriting a tweet means you&#039;re &quot;validating it&#039;s opinion&quot;. They *might* be using it that way but it&#039;s by no means definite. 

Favouriting tweets ia being used more creatively now, especially since @scobleizer&#039;s experiment started. As Twitter search is so poor at finding old tweets, anything I&#039;m slightly interested in I favourite so I can retrieve it later. If I don&#039;t do that it effectively disappears after a few days. 

No fan of #royalfail, just think there&#039;s plenty of ammo to throw at them without attributing opinions to them without sufficient evidence :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree that organisations need to be careful using Twitter. But think it&#8217;s a real stretch to say that favouriting a tweet means you&#8217;re &#8220;validating it&#8217;s opinion&#8221;. They *might* be using it that way but it&#8217;s by no means definite. </p>
<p>Favouriting tweets ia being used more creatively now, especially since @scobleizer&#8217;s experiment started. As Twitter search is so poor at finding old tweets, anything I&#8217;m slightly interested in I favourite so I can retrieve it later. If I don&#8217;t do that it effectively disappears after a few days. </p>
<p>No fan of #royalfail, just think there&#8217;s plenty of ammo to throw at them without attributing opinions to them without sufficient evidence <img src='http://www.pezholio.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pez</title>
		<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Pez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pezholio.co.uk/?p=242#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I guess you&#039;re right, but the fact remains that your Twitter account is the &#039;face&#039; of your organisation, and having tweets like this on your account doesn&#039;t really send the right message. 

While the Royal Mail have made no secret of the fact that they disagree with the strike, they shouldn&#039;t really be going around favouriting tweets that belitttle the situation and use coarse language - they wouldn&#039;t put swearing on their website, so why should their Twitter account be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I guess you&#8217;re right, but the fact remains that your Twitter account is the &#8216;face&#8217; of your organisation, and having tweets like this on your account doesn&#8217;t really send the right message. </p>
<p>While the Royal Mail have made no secret of the fact that they disagree with the strike, they shouldn&#8217;t really be going around favouriting tweets that belitttle the situation and use coarse language &#8211; they wouldn&#8217;t put swearing on their website, so why should their Twitter account be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.pezholio.co.uk/2009/10/royal-mail-calls-striking-workers-whiny-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pezholio.co.uk/?p=242#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;favouriting&quot; can mean whatever you want it to mean. Some people use it to mark messages they particularly like; others use it to mark things they want to remember for later; others use it to record nice things being said about them so they can read it when they&#039;re feeling down. ;) I couldn&#039;t say what&#039;s going on in this instance, seems a bit silly, but I wouldn&#039;t say that favouriting something means you necessarily validate or agree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;favouriting&#8221; can mean whatever you want it to mean. Some people use it to mark messages they particularly like; others use it to mark things they want to remember for later; others use it to record nice things being said about them so they can read it when they&#8217;re feeling down. <img src='http://www.pezholio.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I couldn&#8217;t say what&#8217;s going on in this instance, seems a bit silly, but I wouldn&#8217;t say that favouriting something means you necessarily validate or agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
