Pezholio

14 Sep, 2009

New Twitter Terms of Service – Bye Bye Bots?

Posted by: Pez In: Council Stuff| social-media

Sad Little Robot by Tom Lin :3= on Flickr

Sad Little Robot by Tom Lin :3= on Flickr

For those of you who don’t know, Twitter have recently announced new terms of service, mainly in an attempt to clear up stuff about who owns your tweets, but also to try and stop the flood of spam.

Now, as someone who hates spam on Twitter with a passion bordering on the psychotic, this is a welcome thing, spam is the scourge of Twitter and really needs a serious effort on the part of Twitter to stamp it out. However, there was on term that piqued my interest:

Some of the factors that we take into account when determining what conduct is considered to be spamming are… If your updates consist mainly of links, and not personal updates

Now, as someone who offers two bot-based services, Localgovweb (which retweets any tweet with the #localgovweb hashtag and has 430 followers) and Twitterplan (which sends direct messages to users about planning applications in their area), this made me think – are my accounts going to be suspended because they don’t offer personal updates?

It also calls into question many council Twitter accounts, which use the ‘fire and forget’ method of setting up Twitterfeed to tweet RSS news stories automatically – could they too be in breach of the TOS?

After thinking for a bit, I’d probably say no, automated accounts are only likely to be suspended if you indulge in other types of spammy behaviour (such as mass following, spam complaints, a large number of blocks etc), so as long as you aren’t doing this, you should be OK.

However, if you do run a bot, it might be worth reconsidering how you use Twitter – yes, automatic updates can be useful, but consider breaking up the automatic feeds with more personal updates – is there an event happening in your area that you might not have done a press release about? Or has someone tweeted something about the council that you’d like to respond to?

Peppering your updates with personal stuff of this nature makes the council seem more open and more approachable (if you need some inpiration, check out Walsall Council’s tweets). Behaving like a robot is just going to make your organisation seem like just that, a robot.

7 Responses to "New Twitter Terms of Service – Bye Bye Bots?"

1 | cyberdoyle

September 14th, 2009 at 9:59 am

Avatar

Hope twitter can get rid of the bad bots! also think what you said about councils just autofeeding info into twitter is not a particularly good thing for them to do, its the interaction that makes twitter work as much as the information tweeted.

It has to have some ‘brilliant’ info to keep me following it, and unless it has a human interface I tend to unfollow anything that autotweets stuff. I think it is twitterabuse myself.

2 | Pez

September 14th, 2009 at 10:19 am

Avatar

@Cyberdoyle – I know what you mean, it’s a grey area for me – if it’s done well and offers good content, then I’m cool with it, but if it’s done badly then it just gets annoying.

A council near me (I won’t name and shame), as well as press releases, tweets every time a page is added to the website – not very useful and pretty bloomin’ annoying. It all depends on how much you’re putting out there and how often IMO

Generally if it’s done badly it’s because the people who set it up aren’t Twitter users themselves and don’t ‘get it’, like I said in my post, they just ‘fire and forget’. I’ve made it my personal mission to make them get it!!

3 | paul canning

September 14th, 2009 at 10:29 am

Avatar

This was actually in the old T+Cs – I looked at it when setting up @PubSecBloggers . But there were also some other bits which seemed just as easy to break. The new one also seems to provide several other bits which could be easily broken. We’ve all seen people caught for some unfathomable reason and then had to be set free!

4 | Pez

September 14th, 2009 at 10:33 am

Avatar

Ah, the old #freealncl campaign! A dark day for Twitter.

Yeah, it is worrying, but I think we’re safe for now. It is a good opportunity to reinvestigate why you’re using Twitter, and if you can be using it better. Think it’s already started an interesting debate amongst my followers.

5 | Hadley Beeman

September 14th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

Avatar

Well summarized, Pez– I think you hit on most of what we’ve been discussing today. My (perhaps optimistic) hope is that common sense will continue to guide the Twitter terms of service (and the enforcement thereof!), and that well-valued automated accounts will be allowed to continue.

Personally, I like being able to see the odd RSS feed in with my tweets – it presents articles at a time (and in a format) where I’m ready to use them. I also respect @cyberdoyle’s view against them, and am glad he can easily avoid them (by not following them).

(P.S. I had no idea you were behind @localgovweb. Nicely done!)

6 | Will Twitter’s new terms call time on council feeds? « Sharon O'Dea

September 15th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

Avatar

[...] Stuart Harrison suggests councils mitigate the risk by personalising their tweets, supplementing feed stories with replies and additional information. [...]

7 | Pez

September 16th, 2009 at 9:48 am

Avatar

I agree Hadley, I think it’s going to be one of those things that you’re not ’supposed’ to do, but everyone does anyway, like doing 80 MPH on the motorway. I think common sense will prevail.

I follow a fair few bots, and I do find it useful (especially as I don’t use a feed reader – although I should!), but it is nice to see the automated tweets broken up with more human stuff from time to time.

Glad you like @localgovweb too! :)

Comment Form

Twitter / @pezholio



Desperate monetisation attempt…