Pezholio

09 Sep, 2009

A few thoughts on Birmingham City Council’s website

Posted by: Pez In: Council Stuff|Web Development

Health warning

Before I go any further, it’s worth pointing out that my views are my own, and not the views of my employer – just so you know like.

Well, it’s finally happened – massively over budget, and over three years late, Birmingham City Council’s website has finally launched.

And what a disappointment it is, admittedly it’s an improvement from the old site, which looked like it had crawled out of the mid-90s, but already looks a bit dated – there’s no RSS feeds (apart from feeds for searches – automatically generated by the Google search appliance) and there’s a myriad of other problems.

Birmingham is the second largest local authority in the UK, has a thriving digital community, and the local authority is doing great stuff with Digital Birmingham, so why isn’t this reflected in the city council’s website?

Manchester, a similar sized authority, launched their new website in a fraction of the time it took to launch Birmingham’s, also scooping a BT online excellence award in the process, proving that it doesn’t take an age to launch a website for a large local authority.

Now, I don’t blame the web team for this, they’ve done a very good job given using the tools they’ve been given, but the problem is the system it’s been built on – by all accounts the web team have had very little involvement and most of the grunt work has been done by the council’s outsourced IT ‘partner’ Service Birmingham – operated by everyone’s favourite outsourcer Capita (or Crapita if you read Private Eye).

Not involving the people who know best – the web team – in the first place means not only do you have a system which is massively over budget and more than fashionably late, it also means that you have a site that doesn’t represent Birmingham in a positive light.

Effectively getting an IT outsourcer – who’s expertise is not in the domain of web – is a fatal error – it’s akin to getting a printer to publish a newspaper – they may know about printing, but what do they know about journalism? Obviously there is an overlap, but IT and web are, in main, separate disciplines and this needs to be respected.

Now, my good friend Paul Canning has been banging on about more respect for government webbies for a while, arguing that we need professional status, and this is a textbook example of why this desperately needs to happen, otherwise we’re going to end up with more disasters of this nature.

5 Responses to "A few thoughts on Birmingham City Council’s website"

1 | Twitted by russelltanner

September 9th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

Avatar

[...] This post was Twitted by russelltanner [...]

2 | Martin

September 9th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

Avatar

Spot on my friend, spot on.

3 | paul canning

September 10th, 2009 at 12:08 am

Avatar

Thanks Stuart. As you knew I would I have ‘banged on’ in a blog post :] http://bit.ly/usYN5

4 | stymaster

September 17th, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Avatar

Hmm. Website, big consultancy company, overbudget, not properly involving the people that know?

Sounds familiar, but I’m not saying where. By any chance would the site need far more servers than you thought possible?

5 | Pezholio » Blog Archive » What local authorities can learn from the Birmingham City Council DIY project

September 28th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

Avatar

[...] you’ve had your head buried in a good few feet of sand, then you’ll know all about the issues surrounding the new Birmingham City Council website. I won’t get into it too much here, but, suffice to say, the project was over budget, late [...]

Comment Form