Pezholio

19 Aug, 2009

Lancashire County Council and the Google-isation of government

Posted by: Pez In: Uncategorized

One of Lancashire County Council's homepage adsRecently causing a stir in the online government world has been the new Lancashire County Council homepage. Basically, it rejects the old school (or should that be ‘old skool’?) facets of council homepages, and replaces them with a few links, and a search box. Most of the screen real estate seems to be taken up by a large black and while advert for council services which changes every time you visit it.

It’s certainly split the gov Twitterphere into three – some like it, some hate it and some are not convinced. I’m firmly in the ‘not convinced’ camp. I’ve been thinking about making our homepage just a simple search for a while now, but I don’t think our organisation was ready at the point of the last redesign, so we went for a compromise, with a huge search box at the top of the page to try and encourage searching, as opposed to the traditional navigational route.

With Lancashire however, (which seems to be heavily influenced by Bing – Microsoft’s attempt at a Google killer) I don’t think the search is emphasised enough. Sure, it’s outlined in red, but it’s very tiny and towards the bottom of the page – I can’t see less experienced web users picking up on it. Also, the ‘quick links’ are hidden at the top right and need to be activated by a click.

Westminster City Council's HomepageI much prefer Westminster’s approach, you can’t avoid the search box, it’s bold, clear and in your face. It’s also more service driven, with links to maps, forms and payments, as well as links to the most popular services. Also, if you scroll down, you can still see more traditional things like council news and events (as well as the lovely Google map, which utilises the premier Google Maps API, to get around the Ordnance Survey licensing restrictions). It’s also very Google like, without ripping them off completely, which makes users (experienced and non-experienced) feel at home.

It’s great that trailblazing councils are doing this work though. Hopefully now we’ll see more and more councils following this line, so when we get to our next redesign, the powers that be will be much more comfortable with a simple homepage design.

17 Responses to "Lancashire County Council and the Google-isation of government"

1 | paul canning

August 19th, 2009 at 9:40 am

Avatar

There are two necessary jobs I’m wholly unsure these councils are doing.

1. user testing these new designs, and by that I mean as part of iterative design
2. planning the extra work to tweak results pages, tagging content if necessary and working back from analytics data on what people type in.

I’ve read a number of reviews of these new designs which have people finding bad search results. If that’d been tested and they’d planned out tweaking work these problems wouldn’t exist.

2 | Pez

August 19th, 2009 at 9:42 am

Avatar

Oh yeah, definitely, user testing has to be done (which I don’t think Lancashire have thought about) and yes, it’s pretty useless having a search-based site if your results are junk (and having a Google Mini isn’t a magic bullet).

3 | cyberdoyle

August 19th, 2009 at 9:47 am

Avatar

I have only tested the lancashire CC one so far, but the searches I put in worked right away, I was very impressed.

It is good to know Lancashire is one of the councils thinking out of the box, and catering for its users. Things (as we say here in Lancs) Can Only Get Better.

You have to admire people or councils that make a start and work towards digital engagement and enabling users to access the info they require in an efficient way.
Power to the People.

4 | Philip John

August 19th, 2009 at 9:48 am

Avatar

The classic view is actually better for searching because the search box is top-left where visitor’s eyes start.

5 | martin

August 19th, 2009 at 9:52 am

Avatar

I find it hard to believe Lancs wouldn’t do user testing, maybe one of us should give ‘em a ring and ask ; )

6 | Pez

August 19th, 2009 at 9:53 am

Avatar

@Phil – Yeah, you’re right. The bottom left seems a strange place to put the search box. Seems like it’s been put together with aesthetics in mind first, then usability.

@cyberdoyle – I know what you mean, I’m sure a lot of people will have a positive experience. My worry is that less experienced users won’t know what to do. It’s potentially a big barrier.

7 | Pez

August 19th, 2009 at 9:54 am

Avatar

@Martin – Telephone? What’s one of those? :p

8 | Simon

August 19th, 2009 at 10:08 am

Avatar

It’s a bold and interesting decision that I’m sure others will be watching intently. I hope they do some evaluation and share the results…

Simon

9 | Sarah Lay » Blog Archive » Search-centric vs the signpost

August 19th, 2009 at 10:09 am

Avatar

[...] Stuart Harrison – The Google-isation of local government [...]

10 | paul canning

August 19th, 2009 at 10:52 am

Avatar

@Simon post-design evaluation? surely find the rpoblems rather than create more?

@Pez exactly on ‘less-experienced users’. IME designers often think people have – or worse *should have – the same webskills as them. met far too many who ooze arrogance.

@martin I find it all too easy to believe, and, worse, that it wasn’t done as part of an iterative process, i.e. properly

There’s another issue which is what is their specific homepage use. Most traffic would come from Google search and referrers so is it designed for homepage users? that segment?

@cyberdoyle if search has been properly tweaked and optimised as your searches might suggest then it could work, *but I’m still to be convinced that closing down navigation and forcing a shift to search works for all the audience. I haven’t seen any evidence of that yet.

11 | Pez

August 19th, 2009 at 10:55 am

Avatar

@Paul – I think in a perfect world I’d love to close down all navigation and just have search. Council websites are labyrinthine by their very nature and this can make people who don’t use search think that the site is ‘rubbish’ and ‘complicated’.

I guess this is just me being lazy and, rather than shutting down navigation, we should concentrate on making it better. How to do that though is the big question.

12 | Simon

August 19th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

Avatar

@Paul – post deployment evaluation – is it successful, is it helpful, does it meet users’ expectations, do they find what they need or want, are they looking for what you expected, etc.?

Like you I’d hope that they’ve done user-testing through development, it’s certainly a big step to take without having actually talked to real people during development…

I’m not sure I’ve ever visited my council’s website – what would you actually want to do there? Serious question?

Simon

13 | paul canning

August 19th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

Avatar

@simon UR right of course. Most people don’t visit the sites. It’s relevant to those like Westminster trying to promote (like through maps in the redesign) something I wouldn’t otherwise be aware of. Unless my attention is drawn to it, through marketing the site, why am I going to visit?

14 | Pez

August 19th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

Avatar

I visit my council’s (North Warks) site a lot to get info, but I don’t know whether that’s because I’m a local government webbie or because that’s the done thing. The web url is on all the street signs round my way, which may point people that way as well.

15 | Matt Dodd

August 25th, 2009 at 10:48 am

Avatar

It seems interesting that the underlying theme here is about whether things are tested with users. If you need to convince anyone about testing then I would look at Jakob Neilsen’s findings: “http://www.useit.com/alertbox/guesses-data.html” and “http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designer-user-differences.html”.

In Leicestershire, we have always struggled to get contributors to our website to test with users and we know we have to make improvements, but what we have implemented is (in effect) ongoing live testing with all our users through the use of the SOCITM survey and “comment / rate this page”. All the comments coming in form this are checked monthly and we then note any changes made because of them.

16 | John Fox

August 28th, 2009 at 5:53 am

Avatar

There was a programme of user testing in place prior to the new-look site going live. To what extent that programme reached I do not know, but certainly some degree of examination was carried out that I do know.

For myself I think Lancashire’s implementation works better than Westminster’s, though I agree the search box needs to be more dominant. Two strengths for me are the prominent switch to Classic view (which is not obvious on Westminster’s site) and the strong single-image design of the site’s homepage to support council campaigns. Provided they can maintain the freshness of the design by further campaign images, I think it’s a potential winner.

But as ever, its all very well having a Google style homepage. If you don’t get the fundamentals behind it right then its all rather academic. Reliance on the search means that users must be able to find what they’re looking for first time (or second at a push).

When I tried out Lancashire’s site I gave up on the new model pretty quickly, switching to Classic view for an altogether better user experience.

17 | tom stpehn

December 28th, 2009 at 8:38 am

Avatar

I have only tested the lancashire CC one so far, but the searches I put in worked right away, I was very impressed.

It is good to know Lancashire is one of the councils thinking out of the box, and catering for its users. Things (as we say here in Lancs) Can Only Get Better.

You have to admire people or councils that make a start and work towards digital engagement and enabling users to access the info they require in an efficient way.
Power to the People.

Comment Form